(click on Thumbnail Images for Full Size view)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46ab1/46ab18e5fc9a997ac7a01943e1d009402990fad4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d315/9d3156ef1733850dee09410aabaf555fc4705f2d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31157/311570dd187876e00c6bb43e0918ee326ba62e9d" alt=""
Using filters: Mount the filter of your choice on the lens to select the desired wavelength band.
For normal photography with visible light (400-700 nm) use no filter at all or an external hot mirror filter. Standard white balance settings like sunny, cloudy etc. will be off unless you use an external hot mirror, but most of the time setting a custom white balance will solve this. For infrared (700-1100 nm) use an infrared pass filter like the Hoya or B+W filters. Theoretically you can take UV pictures as well, but filters that pass just UV light (below 400 nm) are expensive, and the 7x7 zoom is not the best choice for UV photography. Make sure you use a lens hood for infrared, because the camera will be more sensitive to internal reflections, hot spot etc. caused by infrared light. Use the highest JPEG quality (or TIFF if you can stand the write times); this will help when postprocessing. Because of diffraction effects, it is best to use apertures between f/2.0 and f/4.0. With smaller apertures, resolution will suffer. With infrared this is more of a problem than with visible light because of the longer wavelength.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eef7/5eef7131f0e4012a142ad60f88d136fea8ad0929" alt=""
IR Filter choice: If you are new to IR photography I recommend
using the Hoya R72 or similar filter; it is high quality, relatively cheap and will work with almost every digital camera for IR photography. For pseudo-color IR photography with the (modified) 7x7, use a filter that transmits both infrared and some visible light, like Hoya R72, B+W 092, Wratten 89B. I recommend setting a custom white balance with the IR filter installed. If you don't do this there will be a strong color cast that can give problems with processing. You can also experiment with filters like 025 red, 099 infracolor, 403 dual band filter etc. However, with these special filters the 7x7 cannot provide a neutral in-camera whitebalance, making postprocessing difficult. Pseudo-color IR with the 7x7 is not easy because there is often very little color present to work with; check my pbase website for some examples. Filter Info
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffc36/ffc36a9f98f8c8bb1b87e442ca70884563c1f831" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a0de/9a0de96fd451945dd25a7d6293b15c4f350839d7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04fc3/04fc3891679cc49ef65e5876f0ce748b4bc7dd9c" alt=""
Using converters: With a standard 7x7 in Nightshot mode, using converters is not an option. With the modified 7x7 converters can be used, but attention is needed for best results. If you are using an infrared filter it will increase the distance between converter and lens, causing loss of corner sharpness and sometimes vignetting. Stopping down will sometimes cure the corner problems, but using small apertures is generally not recommended
. Instead of the usual glass IR filters I now often use polyester IR filters, cut to size, for better corner performance (especially at wide apertures). When using optical converters corner resolution may also suffer because they are not well corrected for the longer IR wavelengths, causing the light to 'smear' in the corners of the image. High quality wide converters like Olympus WCON-07 and Raynox DCR-7900pro (effective focal length 27-30 mm) work very well; picture quality in infrared is much better than with the wideangle zoom setting of the Sony DSC-H9 that I tested earlier this year. Make sure that you don't stop down too much, just 1-2 stops down from full aperture usually gives the best results. Converters like Raynox DCR5000 (effective 19 mm equivalent!!) give a huge field of view (dynamic perspective), but corner sharpness is low even when stopped down; for some subjects the soft corners will be a problem.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08a93/08a934f613fbda57f72bc1b2431cec69d3a10fe0" alt=""
My experience with tele converters in infrared is less favourable; even the high quality converters like Olympus TCON-17 give a big drop in resolution outside the center of the image. The major cause of this is probably chromatic abberation in the Sony Zeiss lens at tele settings, as the same problem appears at the tele end of the zoom (without any converter added). Still the modification helps, because you are now able to take IR pictures handheld in tele position, instead of the former situation where getting a blurred image due to camera shake was unavoidable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/101f5/101f5fb7e618e94651c16c42b1ca9ba7694dae3a" alt=""
Copyright Statement: All images and written materials published in this Guest Article Contribution are copyrighted and are the exclusive property of the author. Images and material may not be reproduced or used in any way without the written consent of the author.
No comments:
Post a Comment